Presumably during the rebinding, several loose leaves were pasted to guards in the gutters or to each other. This, together with possible reorganization of the quire structure, means that the current tentative collation is not necessarily a perfect representation of the original. A stub visible after fol. 9 (no text loss?). Fols. 18 and 19 were once pasted together but have since been reopened. The leaves of the quire containing fols. 19–27 are pasted together in the gutter. Fols. 152 and 153 have been pasted together and to fol. 151 in the gutter.

One modern flyleaf added at the beginning and one at the end. Fols. a–m were removed from the covers during rebinding and are now pasted to guards at the beginning and end of the manuscript. Fols. c–h apparently belong together with part I, and fols. a–b, i–m with parts II and III. Fols. a–f and i–l have been conserved on paper and were pastedowns or interior to the covers. Fols. g, h and m were flyleaves or pastedowns before the binding was taken apart (they contain, for example, ownership markings; see below).