Currently attached to the modern flyleaves of the rebound . Both fragments were trimmed when reused as covers: the fragment at the back is missing its outer and lower margins, and the fragment at the front both its outer and inner margins. The fragment at the back includes the inner margin of another leaf from the same antiphonary, possibly the one now found at the front of the book (but note that if the leaves in fact formed an original bifolium then the original manuscript would have arranged all its Feasts in one temporal series, instead of in separate series of de tempore and de sanctis).

Three sides of both folia are folded, probably in connection with their reuse as covers – note that their combined width when folded falls short of that needed to cover the book, suggesting that the spine of the book was covered with a separate slip that has since been lost. This possibility is supported by the marks left by the bands of the binding, which indicate that the fragment now at the front of the book is the original back cover, and the fragment at the back the front cover. If the two leaves originated as one bifolium this seems to have been also its original orientation, in that case probably the outermost of its original quire.

Both fragments are in very poor condition, even considering their reuse as covers. The sides that presumably faced outward in the cover are deeply stained and the inner sides blackened to the point of illegibility probably from the glue used to fix the cover fillings. Both folia have worn through in places, and from the latter halves of both material has been cut away by a diagonal incision: the detached portions have been sewn back (this piece is now missing from the fragment at the back, although holes show it was once sewn there).